Charge Screening, Large-N, and the Abelian Projection Model of Confinement

Abstract

We point out that the abelian projection theory of quark confinement is in conflict with certain large-N predictions. According to both large-N and lattice strong-coupling arguments, the perimeter law behavior of adjoint Wilson loops at large scales is due to charge-screening, and is suppressed relative to the area term by a factor of $1/N^2$. In the abelian projection theory, however, the perimeter law is due to the fact that $N-1$ out of $N^2-1$ adjoint quark degrees of freedom are (abelian) neutral and unconfined; the suppression factor relative to the area law is thus only $1/N$. We study numerically the behavior of Wilson loops and Polyakov lines with insertions of (abelian) charge projection operators, in maximal abelian gauge. It appears from our data that the forces between abelian charged, and abelian neutral adjoint quarks are not significantly different. We also show via the lattice strong-coupling expansion that, at least at strong couplings, QCD flux tubes attract one another, whereas vortices in type II superconductors repel.

20 pages (Latex), 8 figures, IFUP-TH 54/92

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Center Dominance and Z2 Vortices in SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory
• Dual Superconductor Scenario of Confinement: A Systematic Study of Gribov Copy Effects
• Casimir Scaling vs. Abelian Dominance in QCD String Formation
• Remarks on Stable and Quasi-stable k-Strings at Large N
• Magnetic Monopoles and the Dual London Equation in SU(3) Lattice Gauge Theory
• Abelian dominance and adjoint sources in lattice QCD
• A Magnetic Monopole in Pure SU(2) Gauge Theory
• Flux tubes and their interaction in U(1) lattice gauge theory
• SU(4) string tensions from the fat-center-vortices model
• Remarks on abelian dominance
• Creutz Ratios From Color-Truncated Lattice Configurations