Quasi-Maxwell interpretation of the spin-curvature coupling
arXiv:gr-qc/0701067 · doi:10.1007/s10714-007-0474-7
Abstract
We write the Mathisson-Papapetrou equations of motion for a spinning particle in a stationary spacetime using the quasi-Maxwell formalism and give an interpretation of the coupling between spin and curvature. The formalism is then used to compute equilibrium positions for spinning particles in the NUT spacetime.
9 pages; v2: new section 5, references added; v3: minor changes; v4: missing term in third quasi-Maxwell Einstein equation added, incorrect last statement of the paper deleted; v5: typos corrected; v6: minus sign corrected
References in corpus (6)
- Dynamics of Extended Spinning Masses in a Gravitational Field
- Spinning test particles and clock effect in Kerr spacetime
- Spinning test particles and clock effect in Schwarzschild spacetime
- The Dynamics of a Classical Spinning Particle in Vaidya Space-Time
- Equilibrium conditions of spinning test particles in Kerr-de Sitter spacetimes
- Homogeneous cosmologies from the quasi-Maxwell formalism
Cited by in corpus (15)
- A gravito-electromagnetic analogy based on tidal tensors
- Mathisson's helical motions for a spinning particle --- are they unphysical?
- Gravito-electromagnetic analogies
- Spacetime dynamics of spinning particles - exact electromagnetic analogies
- Relativistic effects due to gravimagnetic moment of a rotating body
- Gravitomagnetism and Pulsar Beam Precession near a Kerr Black Hole
- Reference frames in General Relativity and the galactic rotation curves
- Stirring a black hole
- Gravitomagnetism in the Lewis cylindrical metrics
- Gravitomagnetism and the significance of the curvature scalar invariants
- Relativistic effects cannot explain galactic dynamics
- Reference Frames and the Physical Gravito-Electromagnetic Analogy
- Extended bodies moving on geodesic trajectories
- Non zero Coriolis field in Ehlers' Frame Theory
- Frame-dragging: meaning, myths, and misconceptions