What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity?
arXiv:gr-qc/0611100 · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.09.001
Abstract
On his way to General Relativity (GR) Einstein gave several arguments as to why a special relativistic theory of gravity based on a massless scalar field could be ruled out merely on grounds of theoretical considerations. We re-investigate his two main arguments, which relate to energy conservation and some form of the principle of the universality of free fall. We find that such a theory-based a priori abandonment not to be justified. Rather, the theory seems formally perfectly viable, though in clear contradiction with (later) experiments. This may be of interest to those who teach GR and/or have an active interest in its history.
26 pages, 3 figures
Cited by in corpus (8)
- General Relativity as a Hybrid theory: The Genesis of Einstein's work on the problem of motion
- Space-time Philosophy Reconstructed via Massive Nordström Scalar Gravities? Laws vs. Geometry, Conventionality, and Underdetermination
- Weak equivalence principle for self-gravitating bodies: A sieve for purely metric theories of gravity
- Cosmology in GSG
- Metric Relativity and the Dynamical Bridge: highlights of Riemannian geometry in physics
- Stratified scalar field theories of gravitation with self-energy term and effective particle Lagrangian
- Progress and Gravity: Overcoming Divisions between General Relativity and Particle Physics and between Physics and HPS
- A viable relativistic scalar theory of gravitation