Causal paradoxes: a conflict between relativity and the arrow of time

Abstract

It is often argued that superluminal velocities and nontrivial spacetime topologies, allowed by the theory of relativity, may lead to causal paradoxes. By emphasizing that the notion of causality assumes the existence of a time arrow (TA) that points from the past to the future, the apparent paradoxes appear to be an artefact of the wrong tacit assumption that the relativistic coordinate TA coincides with the physical TA. The latter should be identified with the thermodynamic TA, which, by being absolute and irrotational, does not lead to paradoxes.

7 pages, revised, new references, to appear in Found. Phys. Lett

References in corpus (5)

• Traversable wormholes: Some simple examples
• Traversable wormholes with arbitrarily small energy condition violations
• The Physics of 'Now'
• Can a wormhole supported by only small amounts of exotic matter really be traversable?
• Superluminal pions in a hadronic fluid

Cited by in corpus (9)

• Quantum mechanics: Myths and facts
• Resolving the black-hole information paradox by treating time on an equal footing with space
• Bohmian mechanics in relativistic quantum mechanics, quantum field theory and string theory
• The Universal Arrow of Time I: Classical mechanics
• The existence of superluminal particles is consistent with the kinematics of Einstein's special theory of relativity
• Why Do the Relativistic Masses and Momenta of Faster-than-Light Particles Decrease as their Speeds Increase?
• The Existence of Superluminal Particles is Consistent with Relativistic Dynamics
• Apparent Lorentz violation with superluminal Majorana neutrinos at OPERA?
• Life on a closed timelike curve