Comment to the paper `Conformal transformations single out a unique measure of distance'

Abstract

We discuss the consequences of the incorrectness [see the Erratum in Phys. Rev D 49, 1145 (1994)] of that paper and add two related remarks. The scope of this comment is to encourage further research on: `Which of the conformally equivalent metrics is the physical one?'

4 pages, LaTeX, published in Phys. Rev. D52, 6198 (1995)

Cited by in corpus (9)

• The role of energy conditions in $f(R)$ cosmology
• Fourth order gravity: equations, history, and applications to cosmology
• Tensor-multi-scalar theories from multidimensional cosmology
• Strong energy condition and the repulsive character of f(R) gravity
• Some remarks about non-minimally coupled scalar field models
• Intermediate accelerated solutions as generic late-time attractors in a modified Jordan-Brans-Dicke theory
• Phase-space of flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker models with both a scalar field coupled to matter and radiation
• Stability of a modified Jordan-Brans-Dicke theory in the dilatonic frame
• Linearization of a warped $f(R)$ theory in the higher-order frame