Does the third law of black hole thermodynamics really have a serious failure?
arXiv:gr-qc/0009049 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/20/410
Abstract
The almost perfect correspondence between certain laws of classical black hole mechanics and the ordinary laws of thermodynamics is spoiled by the failure of the conventional back hole analogue of the third law. Our aim here is to contribute to the associated discussion by flashing light on some simple facts of black hole physics. However, no attempt is made to lay to rest the corresponding long lasting debate. Instead, merely some evidence is provided to make it clear that although the borderline between extremal and non-extremal black holes is very thin they are essentially different. Hopefully, a careful investigation of the related issues will end up with an appropriate form of the third law and hence with an unblemished setting of black hole thermodynamics.
6 pages, Latex. accepted for publication in Class. Quant. Grav
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Dirty black holes: Spacetime geometry and near-horizon symmetries
- Circular Orbits in Extremal Reissner Nordstrom Spacetimes
- Black Holes and the Third Law of Thermodynamics
- The third law of thermodynamics, non-extensivity, and energy definition in black hole physics
- Geometric aspects of Extremal Kerr black hole entropy
- What are extremal Kerr Killing vectors up to?
- Weak Energy Condition, Trapped Surfaces and Black hole Third Law