Reply to "Comment on `General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions'"
arXiv:cond-mat/9811304 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.5175
Abstract
In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the analysis of reference cond-mat/9808140.
2 pages, 1 postscript figure, revtex, 2 References updated
References in corpus (4)
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Nature of the phase transition of the three-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg spin glass
- Monte Carlo studies of the chiral and spin orderings of the three-dimensional Heisenberg spin glass
- Universality and multifractal behaviour of spin-spin correlation functions in disordered Potts models
- Spin glasses without time-reversal symmetry and the absence of a genuine structural glass transition
- Predictive power of MCT: Numerics and Finite size scaling for a mean field spin glass
- How the Replica-Symmetry-Breaking Transition Looks Like in Finite-Size Simulations
- Monte Carlo Studies of the Ordering of the Three-Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Spin Glass in Magnetic Fields
- Universality and universal finite-size scaling functions in four-dimensional Ising spin glasses
- Comment on "General Method to Determine Replica Symmetry Breaking Transitions"
- Numerical study of the SK Model in magnetic field
- Monte Carlo simulations of the three-dimensional XY spin glass focusing on the chiral and the spin order
- Dependence of RNA secondary structure on the energy model
- Order-parameter fluctuations in Ising spin glasses at low temperatures
- A conjectured scenario for order-parameter fluctuations in spin glasses
- Scaling approach to order-parameter fluctuations in disordered frustrated systems