paper

Comment on: ``Using Ni Substitution and O NMR to Probe the Susceptibility in Cuprates''

arXiv:cond-mat/9710257 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3662

Abstract

In a recent letter (PRL 79, 2117 (1997)), Bobroff et al. presented novel O NMR measurements for YBa_2(Cu_{1-x}Ni_x)_3O_{6+y} which offer a new probe of the momentum dependence of the static spin susceptibility . They analyzed the O line width by assuming a Gaussian form for , and came to the conclusion that the correlation length is independent of temperature . Furthermore, they claim that a Lorentzian form of yields the same result. We will demonstrate that the Lorentzian and Gaussian form of actually yield qualitatively different results for the O line width and its dependence on . We show that their data when combined with data from Takigawa require that be T-dependent. Furthermore, assuming a Gaussian form of leads to the unphysical result that increases with . In contrast, the Lorentzian form of yields that decreases with increasing and is thus fully compatible with the experimental results.

1 page, RevTeX, 1 eps figure embedded in the text, submitted to PRL

References in corpus (1)

Cited by in corpus (5)