Reply to a Comment on ``Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory''
arXiv:cond-mat/0604084 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.139702
Abstract
In our reply, we show that the objections put forward in cond-mat/0508763 concerning our paper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 136405 (2004), are not valid: (i) There is no orthogonality catastrophe (OC) for our calculations, and it is also generally not ``unpractical'' to avoid it. (ii) The OC does not affect our results.
1 page, 1 figure, Phys. Rev. Lett. in print; also note cond-mat/0509443
References in corpus (4)
- Orbital-selective Mott-Hubbard transition in the two-band Hubbard model
- Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory
- From d- to p-wave pairing in the t-t' Hubbard model at zero temperature
- Comment on "Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory"
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Diagrammatic Determinantal methods: projective schemes and applications to the Hubbard-Holstein model
- Bandstructure meets many-body theory: The LDA+DMFT method
- Charge and orbital order in transition metal oxides
- Comment on "Projective Quantum Monte Carlo Method for the Anderson Impurity Model and its Application to Dynamical Mean Field Theory"