On the free energy within the mean-field approximation

Abstract

We compare two widespread formulations of the mean-field approximation, based on minimizing an appropriately built mean-field free energy. We use the example of the antiferromagnetic Ising model to show that one of these formulations does not guarantee the existence of an underlying variational principle. This results in a severe failure where straightforward minimization of the corresponding mean-field free energy leads to incorrect results.

pedagogical paper for undergraduate teaching, to appear in Eur. J. Physics

Cited by in corpus (10)

• Interacting Stochastic Topology and Mott Transition from Light Response
• Majorana spin liquid and dimensional reduction in Cs2CuCl4
• Progress in numerical simulations of systems with a $\theta -$vacuum like term: The two and three-dimensional Ising model within an imaginary magnetic field
• Macroscopically constrained Wang-Landau method for systems with multiple order parameters and its application to drawing complex phase diagrams
• Multistability in an unusual phase diagram induced by the competition between antiferromagnetic-like short-range and ferromagnetic-like long-range interactions
• Ising spin glass models versus Ising models: an effective mapping at high temperature I. General result
• Dipolar ordering transitions in many-body quantum optics: Analytical diagrammatic approach to equilibrium quantum spins
• Superconductivity with repulsion: a variational approach
• A plausible mechanism of muscle stabilization in stall conditions
• Generalized susceptibilities and Landau parameters for anisotropic Fermi liquids