Static Versus Dynamic Friction: The Role of Coherence

Abstract

A simple model for solid friction is analyzed. It is based on tangential springs representing interlocked asperities of the surfaces in contact. Each spring is given a maximal strain according to a probability distribution. At their maximal strain the springs break irreversibly. Initially all springs are assumed to have zero strain, because at static contact local elastic stresses are expected to relax. Relative tangential motion of the two solids leads to a loss of coherence of the initial state: The springs get out of phase due to differences in their sizes. This mechanism alone is shown to lead to a difference between static and dynamic friction forces already. We find that in this case the ratio of the static and dynamic coefficients decreases with increasing relative width of the probability distribution, and has a lower bound of 1 and an upper bound of 2.

arXiv comment10 pages, 2 figures, revtex4

References in corpus (3)

• Simple Microscopic Theory of Amontons' Laws for Static Friction
• Towards a statistical theory of solid dry friction
• Coupling between static friction force and torque

Cited by in corpus (5)

• Modeling friction on a mesoscale: Master equation for the earthquake-like model
• Master equation approach to friction at the mesoscale
• On the speed of fast and slow rupture fronts along frictional interfaces
• History-dependent friction and slow slip from time-dependent microscopic junction laws studied in a statistical framework
• Collective effects at frictional interfaces