Reply to the Comment by Sandvik, Sengupta, and Campbell on ``Ground State Phase Diagram of a Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model''

Abstract

In their Comment (see cond-mat/0301237), Sandvik, Sengupta, and Campbell present some numerical evidences to support the existence of an extended bond-order-wave (BOW) phase at couplings (U,V) weaker than a tricritical point (U_t,V_t) in the ground state phase diagram of the one-dimensional half-filled U-V Hubbard model. They claim that their results do not agree with the phase diagram proposed in my Letter (cond-mat/0204244), which shows a BOW phase for couplings stronger than the critical point only. However, I argue here that their results are not conclusive and do not refute the phase diagram described in the Letter.

1 page, published version

References in corpus (1)

• Comment on ``Ground State Phase Diagram of a Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model''

Cited by in corpus (9)

• The density-matrix renormalization group
• Ground state phases of the Half-Filled One-Dimensional Extended Hubbard Model
• Dimerization in a half-filled one-dimensional extended Hubbard model
• Functional Renormalization Group Analysis of the Half-filled One-dimensional Extended Hubbard Model
• Search for quantum dimer phases and transitions in a frustrated spin ladder
• Density Matrix Spectra and Order Parameters in the 1D Extended Hubbard Model
• From phase separation to long-range order in a system of interacting electrons
• Comment on "Accurate ground-state phase diagram of the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model at half filling"
• Static versus dynamic fluctuations in the one-dimensional extended Hubbard model