Weakly nonlinear theory of grain boundary motion in patterns with crystalline symmetry
arXiv:cond-mat/0203389 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.055501
Abstract
We study the motion of a grain boundary separating two otherwise stationary domains of hexagonal symmetry. Starting from an order parameter equation appropriate for hexagonal patterns, a multiple scale analysis leads to an analytical equation of motion for the boundary that shares many properties with that of a crystalline solid. We find that defect motion is generically opposed by a pinning force that arises from non-adiabatic corrections to the standard amplitude equation. The magnitude of this force depends sharply on the mis-orientation angle between adjacent domains so that the most easily pinned grain boundaries are those with an angle between four and eight degrees. Although pinning effects may be small, they do not vanish asymptotically near the onset of this subcritical bifurcation, and can be orders of magnitude larger than those present in smectic phases that bifurcate supercritically.
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (13)
- Modeling Elastic and Plastic Deformations in Non-Equilibrium Processing Using Phase Field Crystals
- Grain growth beyond the Mullins model, capturing the complex physics behind universal grain size distributions
- Dislocation dynamics and crystal plasticity in the phase field crystal model
- Mesoscale model of dislocation motion and crystal plasticity
- Nucleation of stable cylinders from a metastable lamellar phase in a diblock copolymer melt
- A coarse-grained phase-field crystal model of plastic motion
- Unified Theoretical Framework for Polycrystalline Pattern Evolution
- A phase field crystal theory of the kinematics of dislocation lines
- Scale coupling and interface pinning effects in the phase-field-crystal model
- Numerical study of domain coarsening in anisotropic stripe patterns
- Coordinated optimization of visual cortical maps (II) Numerical studies
- Modeling grain boundaries in solids using a combined nonlinear and geometrical method
- Elasticity versus phase field driven motion in the phase field crystal model