Comment on "Why is the DNA denaturation transition first order?"
arXiv:cond-mat/0110164 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.159801
Abstract
In this comment we argue that while the conclusions in the original paper (Y. Kafri, D. Mukamel and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4988 (2000)) are correct for asymptotically long DNA chains, they do not apply to the chains used in typical experiments. In the added last paragraph, we point out that for real DNA the average distance between denatured loops is not of the order of the persistence length of a single-stranded chain but much larger. This corroborates our reasoning that the double helix between loops is quite rigid, and thereby our conclusion.
1 page, REVTeX. Last paragraph added
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Reparametrizing loop entropy weights: Effect on DNA melting curves
- Bubble dynamics in DNA
- Poland-Scheraga models and the DNA denaturation transition
- Stochastic approach to DNA breathing dynamics
- Denaturation Patterns in Heterogeneous DNA
- Numerical study on a disordered model for DNA denaturation transition
- Numerical evidence for relevance of disorder in a Poland-Scheraga DNA denaturation model with self-avoidance: Scaling behavior of average quantities
- Bubble merging in breathing DNA as a vicious walker problem in opposite potentials
- Numerical study of DNA denaturation with self-avoidance: pseudo-critical temperatures and finite size behaviour