Reply to Suslov

Abstract

In a recent submission to this archive arXiv:cond-mat/0105325, Suslov has claimed that our recent numerical estimate of the critical exponent of the Anderson transition $\nu =1.57\pm .02$ is in error and that the available numerical data are consistent with a value of $\nu =1$. We contest this claim and demonstrate using Suslov's own scaling procedure that $\nu \ne 1$