Stripes: Why hole rich lines are antiphase domain walls?
arXiv:cond-mat/0001217 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.174411
Abstract
For stripes of hole rich lines in doped antiferromagnets, we investigate the competition between anti-phase and in-phase domain wall ground state configurations. We argue that a phase transition must occure as a function of the electron/hole filling fraction of the domain wall. Due to {\em transverse} kinetic hole fluctuations, empty domain walls are always anti-phase. At arbitrary electron filling fraction () of the domain wall (and in particular for as in LaNdSrCuO), it is essential to account also for the transverse magnetic interactions of the electrons and their mobility {\em along} the domain wall. We find that the transition from anti-phase to in-phase stripe domain wall occurs at a critical filling fraction , for any value of . We further use our model to estimate the spin-wave velocity in a stripe system. Finally, relate the results of our microscopic model to previous Landau theory approach to stripes.
11 pages, 3 figures
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (7)
- Dynamical layer decoupling in a stripe-ordered, high T_c superconductor
- Anisotropic Magnetoresistance in Lightly Doped La_{2-x}Sr_{x}CuO_{4}: Impact of Anti-Phase Domain Boundaries on the Electron Transport
- Thermal Conductivity of Pr_{1.3-x}La_{0.7}Ce_xCuO_4 Single Crystals and Signatures of Stripes in an Electron-Doped Cuprate
- Band structure of Charge Ordered Doped Antiferromagnets
- Modelling Magnetic Fluctuations in the Stripe Ordered State
- Pairing and Density Correlations of Stripe Electrons in a Two-Dimensional Antiferromagnet
- Low-energy Effective Theory for Spin Dynamics of Fluctuating Stripes