Is the Large Magellanic Cloud a Large Microlensing Cloud?
arXiv:astro-ph/9909254 · doi:10.1086/308328
Abstract
An expression is provided for the self-lensing optical depth of the thin LMC disk surrounded by a shroud of stars at larger scale heights. The formula is written in terms of the vertical velocity dispersion of the thin disk population. If tidal forcing causes 1-5 % of the disk mass to have a height larger than 6 kpc and 10-15 % to have a height above 3 kpc, then the self-lensing optical depth of the LMC is , which is within the observational uncertainties. The shroud may be composed of bright stars provided they are not in stellar hydrodynamical equilibrium. Alternatively, the shroud may be built from low mass stars or compact objects, though then the self-lensing optical depths are overestimates of the true optical depth by a factor of roughly 3. The distributions of timescales of the events and their spatial variation across the face of the LMC disk offer possibilities of identifying the dominant lens population. In propitious circumstances, an experiment lifetime of less than 5 years is sufficient to decide between the competing claims of Milky Way halos and LMC lenses. However, LMC disks can sometimes mimic the microlensing properties of Galactic halos for many years and then decades of survey work are needed. In this case observations of parallax or binary caustic events offer the best hope for current experiments to deduce the lens population. The difficult models to distinguish are Milky Way halos in which the lens fraction is low (< 10 %) and fattened LMC disks composed of lenses with a typical mass of low luminosity stars or greater. A next-generation wide-area microlensing survey, such as the proposed ``SuperMACHO'' experiment, will be able to distinguish even these difficult models with just a year or two of data.
25 pages, 4 figures, The Astrophysical Journal (in press)
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (28)
- Gravitational Lensing
- The Metamorphosis of Tidally Stirred Dwarf Galaxies
- The Rotation Curve of the Large Magellanic Cloud and the Implications for Microlensing
- No massive black holes in the Milky Way halo
- Astrometric Microlensing with the GAIA satellite
- Gravitational lensing in fourth order gravity
- Hypervelocity runaways from the Large Magellanic Cloud
- Antimatter and antistars in the universe and in the Galaxy
- Theory of pixel lensing towards M31 I: the density contribution and mass of MACHOs
- The Origin of the Microlensing Events Observed Towards the LMC and the Stellar Counterpart of the Magellanic Stream
- The Wendelstein Calar Alto Pixellensing Project(WeCAPP): First MACHO Candidates
- Large Magellanic Cloud Microlensing Optical Depth with Imperfect Event Selection
- The So-Called "Bar" in the Large Magellanic Cloud
- Microlensing towards the SMC: a new analysis of OGLE and EROS results
- A new look at microlensing limits on dark matter in the Galactic halo
- WeCAPP - The Wendelstein Calar Alto Pixellensing Project I Tracing Dark and Bright Matter in M31
- LMC Self-lensing from a new perspective
- The MACHO Project Hubble Space Telescope Follow-Up: Preliminary Results on the Location of the Large Magellanic Cloud Microlensing Source Stars
- Microlensing towards the Large Magellanic Cloud
- The Structure of the Large Magellanic Halo Stellar Halo Derived Using OGLE-III RR Lyr stars
- Kinematic outliers in the LMC: constraints on star-star microlensing
- Photometric Confirmation of MACHO Large Magellanic Cloud Microlensing Events
- Contamination in the MACHO dataset and the puzzle of LMC Microlensing
- Are there MACHOs in the Milky Way halo?
- M31 Pixel Lensing PLAN Campaign: MACHO Lensing and Self Lensing Signals
- Magnitude bias of microlensed sources towards the Large Magellanic Cloud
- Identification of the Microlens in Event MACHO-LMC-20
- Pixel lensing observations towards globular clusters