The Velocity Field Predicted by the Optical Redshift Survey

Abstract

We have used the Optical Redshift Survey (ORS; Santiago et al. 1995) to construct the gravity field due to fluctuations in the galaxy density field out to distances of 8000 km/s. At large scales where linear theory applies, the comparison of this gravity field with the observed peculiar velocity field offers a powerful cosmological probe, because the predicted flow field is proportional to the parameter Omega^{0.6}/b, where Omega is the matter density and b is the bias of the galaxy distribution. The more densely sampled ORS gravity field, to excellent approximation, matches that of the earlier IRAS 1.2-Jy redshift survey (Fisher et al. 1995), provided beta is reduced by a factor b(opt)/b(IRAS)=1.4. Apart from this scaling, the most significant difference between the ORS and IRAS fields is induced by differing estimates of the over-density of the Virgo cluster. Neither of these gravity fields is consistent with the peculiar velocity field constructed from the full Mark III (Willick et al. 1997) sample. We find that a simple but plausible non-linear bias algorithm for the galaxy distribution relative to the mass has a negligible effect on the derived fields. We conclude that the substitution of optical for IRAS catalogues cannot alone resolve the discrepancies between the IRAS gravity field and the Mark III peculiar velocity field.

fixed minor bug in Figures; 17 pages (includes figures); uses emulateapj.sty (included); PostScript version also available from http://astro.berkeley.edu/~jbaker/ors/ors.ps.gz

References in corpus (5)

• Maximum-Likelihood Comparisons of Tully-Fisher and Redshift Data: Constraints on Omega and Biasing
• IRAS versus POTENT Density Fields on Large Scales: Biasing and Omega
• The Velocity Field from Type Ia Supernovae Matches the Gravity Field from Galaxy Surveys
• The Topology of the IRAS Point Source Catalogue Redshift Survey
• Comparison of the SFI Peculiar Velocities with the IRAS 1.2 Jy Gravity Field

Cited by in corpus (20)

• Deviations from the Local Hubble Flow. I. The Tip of the Red Giant Branch as a Distance Indicator
• A Non Parametric Model for the Cosmic Velocity Field
• Nearby Optical Galaxies: Selection of the Sample and Identification of Groups
• Early-type Galaxy Distances from the Fundamental Plane and Surface Brightness Fluctuations
• The Nearby Optical Galaxy Sample: The Local Galaxy Luminosity Function
• A First Comparison of the SBF Survey Distances with the Galaxy Density Field: Implications for H_0 and Omega
• A Comparison of Local SNIa with the IRAS PSCz Gravity Field
• GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey: VII. Probing galaxy bias using weak gravitational lensing
• A case devoid of bias: ORS voids vs. IRAS voids
• Consistent beta values from density-density and velocity-velocity comparisons
• A Comparison of The PSCz and Stromlo-APM Redshift Surveys
• The Stellar Content of the Halo of NGC 5907 from Deep HST NICMOS Imaging
• An Overview of Uncovered and Suspected Large-Scale Structures behind the Milky Way
• Time evolution of the stochastic linear bias of interacting galaxies on linear scales
• The Galaxy-Weighted Small-Scale Velocity Dispersion of the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
• The 1-point PDF of the Initial Conditions of our Local Universe from the IRAS PSC redshift catalogue
• Revision of the Selection Function of the Optical Redshift Survey using the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Early Data Release: Toward an Accurate Estimate of Source Number Density of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays
• Breaking the degeneracy of cosmological parameters in galaxy redshift surveys
• Overconstrained dynamics in galaxy redshift surveys
• Reconstruction Analysis of the IRAS Point Source Catalog Redshift Survey