Are optically-selected QSO catalogs biased ?
arXiv:astro-ph/9707153 · doi:10.1086/118601
Abstract
A thorough study of QSO-galaxy correlations has been done on a region close to the North Galactic Pole using a complete subsample of the optically selected CFHT/MMT QSO survey and the galaxy catalog of Odewahn and Aldering (1995). Although a positive correlation between bright QSOs and galaxies is expected because of the magnification bias effect, none is detected. On the contrary, there is a significant (>99.6%) anticorrelation between z<1.6 QSOs and red galaxies on rather large angular distances. This anticorrelation is much less pronounced for high redshift z>1.6 QSOs, which seems to exclude dust as a cause of the QSO underdensity. This result suggests that the selection process employed in the CFHT/MMT QSO survey is losing up to 50% of low redshift z<1.6 QSOs in regions of high galaxy density. The incompleteness in the whole z<1.6 QSO sample may reach 10% and have important consequences in the estimation of QSO evolution and the QSO autocorrelation function.
17 pages LaTeX (aasms4), plus 6 EPS figures. To be published in the Astronomical Journal
Cited by in corpus (9)
- Gravitational Lensing
- Detection of Cosmic Magnification with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- On Statistical Lensing and the Anti-Correlation Between 2dF QSOs and Foreground Galaxies
- Quasar-Galaxy and Galaxy-Galaxy Cross-Correlations: Model Predictions with Realistic Galaxies
- The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - X. Lensing of Background QSOs by Galaxy Groups
- Quasar-galaxy associations revisited
- Weak Lensing Induced Correlations Between 1 Jy QSOs and APM Galaxies on Angular Scales of a Degree
- Measuring Omega/b with weak lensing
- Effect of dust in circumgalactic haloes on the cosmic shear power spectrum