Getting the Measure of the Flatness Problem
arXiv:astro-ph/9507020 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/12/10/001
Abstract
The problem of estimating cosmological parameters such as from noisy or incomplete data is an example of an inverse problem and, as such, generally requires a probablistic approach. We adopt the Bayesian interpretation of probability for such problems and stress the connection between probability and information which this approach makes explicit. This connection is important even when information is ``minimal'' or, in other words, when we need to argue from a state of maximum ignorance. We use the transformation group method of Jaynes to assign minimally--informative prior probability measure for cosmological parameters in the simple example of a dust Friedman model, showing that the usual statements of the cosmological flatness problem are based on an inappropriate choice of prior. We further demonstrate that, in the framework of a classical cosmological model, there is no flatness problem.
11 pages, submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity, Tex source file, no figure
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (6)
- Inflation after Planck: Judgment Day
- How Problematic is the Near-Euclidean Spatial Geometry of the Large-Scale Universe?
- Varying c cosmology and Planck value constraints
- Is there a flatness problem in classical cosmology?
- A measure on the set of compact Friedmann-Lemaitre-Robertson-Walker models
- The Virtues of Frugality - Why cosmological observers should release their data slowly