GRO J1744-28, search for the counterpart: infrared photometry and spectroscopy
arXiv:astro-ph/0703692 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12152.x
Abstract
Using VLT/ISAAC, we detected 2 candidate counterparts to the bursting pulsar GRO J1744-28, one bright and one faint, within the X-ray error circles of XMM-Newton and Chandra. In determining the spectral types of the counterparts we applied 3 different extinction corrections; one for an all-sky value, one for a Galactic Bulge value and one for a local value. We find the local value, with an extinction law of alpha = 3.23 +- 0.01 is the only correction that results in colours and magnitudes for both bright and faint counterparts consistent with a small range of spectral types, and for the bright counterpart, consistent with the spectroscopic identification. Photometry of the faint candidate indicates it is a K7/M0 V star at a distance of 3.75 +- 1 kpc. This star would require a very low inclination angle (i < 9deg) to satisfy the mass function constraints; however it cannot be excluded as the counterpart without follow-up spectroscopy to detect emission signatures of accretion. Photometry and spectroscopy of the bright candidate indicate it is most likely a G/K III star. The spectrum does not show Br-gamma emission, a known indicator of accretion. The bright star's magnitudes are in agreement with the constraints placed on a probable counterpart by the calculations of Rappaport & Joss (1997) for an evolved star that has had its envelope stripped. The mass function indicates the counterpart should have M < 0.3 Msol for an inclination of i >= 15deg; a stripped giant, or a main sequence M3+ V star are consistent with this mass-function constraint. In both cases mass-transfer, if present, will be by wind-accretion as the counterpart will not fill its Roche lobe given the observed orbital period. The derived magnetic field of 2.4 x 10^{11} G will inhibit accretion by the propeller effect, hence its quiescent state.
12 pages, 6 figures, 4 table, MNRAS accepted Changes to the content and an increased analysis of the Galactic centre extinction
References in corpus (6)
- An Analysis of the Shapes of Interstellar Extinction Curves. V. The IR-Through-UV Curve Morphology
- Interstellar Extinction Law in the J, H, and Ks Bands toward the Galactic Center
- The Distance to the Galactic Center Derived From Infrared Photometry of Bulge Red Clump Stars
- A large scale extinction map of the Galactic Anticenter from 2MASS
- Extinction techniques and impact on dust property determination
- Complex small-scale structure in the infrared extinction towards the Galactic Centre
Cited by in corpus (19)
- VISTA Variables in the Via Lactea (VVV): The public ESO near-IR variability survey of the Milky Way
- The Ups & Downs of Accreting X-Ray Pulsars: Decade-long observations with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
- The complex, variable near infrared extinction towards the Nuclear Bulge
- High-Resolution X-Ray Spectroscopy of the Bursting Pulsar GRO J1744-28
- Low-Mass X-ray Binaries
- GRO J1744-28: an intermediate B-field pulsar in a low mass X-ray binary
- Simultaneous NuSTAR/Chandra observations of the Bursting Pulsar GRO J1744-28 during its third reactivation
- Evidence for the radiation-pressure dominated accretion disk in bursting pulsar GRO J1744-28 using timing analysis
- A Search for the Near-Infrared Counterpart to GCRT J1745-3009
- Study of the accretion torque during the 2014 outburst of the X-ray pulsar GRO J1744-28
- A New 626 s Periodic X-ray Source in the Direction of the Galactic Center
- The Evolution of X-ray Bursts in the "Bursting Pulsar" GRO J1744-28
- The relation between outburst rate and orbital period in low-mass X-ray binary transients
- Observations of GRO J1744-28 in quiescence with XMM-Newton
- Catalog of outbursts of neutron star LMXBs
- NuSTAR observation of GRO J1744-28 at low mass accretion rate
- Discovery of hard phase lags in the pulsed emission of GRO J1744-28
- The Bursting Pulsar GRO J1744-28: the Slowest Transitional Pulsar?
- Recurrent Instability in LMXB Accretion Disks: How Strange is GRS 1915+105?