Dark Energy versus Modified Gravity
arXiv:astro-ph/0612452 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.121301
Abstract
There is now strong observational evidence that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. The standard explanation invokes an unknown "dark energy" component. But such scenarios are faced with serious theoretical problems, which has led to increased interest in models where instead General Relativity is modified in a way that leads to the observed accelerated expansion. The question then arises whether the two scenarios can be distinguished. Here we show that this may not be so easy, demonstrating explicitely that a generalised dark energy model can match the growth rate of the DGP model and reproduce the 3+1 dimensional metric perturbations. Cosmological observations are then unable to distinguish the two cases.
4 pages, 2 figures
Cited by in corpus (13)
- A Parameterized Post-Friedmann Framework for Modified Gravity
- A discriminating probe of gravity at cosmological scales
- Dark Energy and Dark Gravity
- Cosmic Microwave Weak lensing data as a test for the dark universe
- On the growth of linear perturbations
- Parametrized Post-Friedmann Signatures of Acceleration in the CMB
- Is Modified Gravity Required by Observations? An Empirical Consistency Test of Dark Energy Models
- Growth Index of DGP Model and Current Growth Rate Data
- New interactions in the dark sector mediated by dark energy
- How to Distinguish Dark Energy and Modified Gravity?
- Planck priors for dark energy surveys
- A Consistency Relation in Cosmology
- Probing the nature of cosmic acceleration