Interloper treatment in dynamical modelling of galaxy clusters
arXiv:astro-ph/0606579 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066813
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to study the efficiency of different approaches to interloper treatment in dynamical modelling of galaxy clusters. Using cosmological N-body simulation of standard LCDM model, we select 10 massive dark matter haloes and use their particles to emulate mock kinematic data in terms of projected galaxy positions and velocities as they would be measured by a distant observer. Taking advantage of the full 3D information available from the simulation, we select samples of interlopers defined with different criteria. The interlopers thus selected provide means to assess the efficiency of different interloper removal schemes found in the literature. We study direct methods of interloper removal based on dynamical or statistical restrictions imposed on ranges of positions and velocities available to cluster members. In determining these ranges, we use either the velocity dispersion criterion or a maximum velocity profile. We also generalize the common approaches taking into account both the position and velocity information. Another criterion is based on the dependence of the commonly used virial mass and projected mass estimators on the presence of interlopers. We find that the direct methods exclude on average 60-70 percent of unbound particles producing a sample with contamination as low as 2-4 percent. Next, we consider indirect methods of interloper treatment which are applied to the data stacked from many objects. In these approaches, interlopers are treated in a statistical way as a uniform background which modifies the distribution of cluster members. Using a Bayesian approach, we reproduce the properties of composite clusters and estimate the probability of finding an interloper as a function of distance from the object centre.
15 pages, 14 figures, final version accepted for publication in A&A
References in corpus (29)
- A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
- Adaptive Refinement Tree - a new high-resolution N-body code for cosmological simulations
- Velocity and spatial biases in CDM subhalo distributions
- Properties of spherical galaxies and clusters with an NFW density profile
- Dark matter in elliptical galaxies: II. Estimating the mass within the virial radius
- Dark matter distribution in the Coma cluster from galaxy kinematics: breaking the mass-anisotropy degeneracy
- Mass estimation in the outer regions of galaxy clusters
- Infall Regions of Galaxy Clusters
- Evidence for X-ray emission from a large-scale filament of galaxies ?
- The Observational Distribution of Internal Velocity Dispersions in Nearby Galaxy Clusters
- The Average Mass Profile of Galaxy Clusters
- Generating Equilibrium Dark Matter Halos: Inadequacies of the Local Maxwellian Approximation
- On the efficiency and reliability of cluster mass estimates based on member galaxies
- WINGS: a WIde-field Nearby Galaxy-cluster Survey. I - Optical imaging
- Observing the dark matter density profile of isolated galaxies
- The velocity and mass distribution of clusters of galaxies from the CNOC1 cluster redshift survey
- How far do they go? The outer structure of dark matter halos
- Constrained Simulations of the Real Universe: the Local Supercluster
- Clustering of Galaxies in a Hierarchical Universe: III. Mock Redshift Surveys
- The ESO Nearby Abell Cluster Survey. XIII. The orbits of the different types of galaxies in rich clusters
- The mass profile of galaxy clusters out to ~2 r200
- Projection effects in cluster catalogues
- Towards Understanding Galaxy Clusters and Their Constituents:Projection Effects on Velocity Dispersion, X-Ray Emission, Mass Estimates, Gas Fraction and Substructure
- Mass distribution in nearby Abell clusters
- Velocity distributions in clusters of galaxies
- Constraining the Projected Radial Distribution of Galactic Satellites with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Radial velocity moments of dark matter haloes
- A Redshift Survey of Nearby Galaxy Groups: the Shape of the Mass Density Profile
- How reliable is the kinematical evidence for dark matter: the effects of non-sphericity, substructure and streaming motions
Cited by in corpus (65)
- A MaxBCG Catalog of 13,823 Galaxy Clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population
- MAMPOSSt: Modelling Anisotropy and Mass Profiles of Observed Spherical Systems. I. Gaussian 3D velocities
- CLASH-VLT: The mass, velocity-anisotropy, and pseudo-phase-space density profiles of the z=0.44 galaxy cluster MACS 1206.2-0847
- WINGS-SPE Spectroscopy in the WIde-field Nearby Galaxy-cluster Survey
- Toward Unbiased Galaxy Cluster Masses from Line of Sight Velocity Dispersions
- The mass and velocity anisotropy of the Carina, Fornax, Sculptor and Sextans dwarf spheroidal galaxies
- Gravitational redshift of galaxies in clusters as predicted by general relativity
- CLASH: Mass Distribution in and around MACS J1206.2-0847 from a Full Cluster Lensing Analysis
- Cluster Galaxy Dynamics and the Effects of Large Scale Environment
- The Mean and Scatter of the Velocity Dispersion-Optical Richness Relation for maxBCG Galaxy Clusters
- The universal distribution of halo interlopers in projected phase space. Bias in galaxy cluster concentration and velocity anisotropy?
- Mass modelling of dwarf spheroidal galaxies: the effect of unbound stars from tidal tails and the Milky Way
- Internal kinematics and dynamical models of dwarf spheroidal galaxies around the Milky Way
- Physical properties underlying observed kinematics of satellite galaxies
- The SAMI Galaxy Survey: The cluster redshift survey, target selection and cluster properties
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: II. Quantifying scatter and bias using contrasting mock catalogues
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project: I. Methods and first results on galaxy-based techniques
- The distribution function of dark matter in massive haloes
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Estimation from Stacked Spectroscopic Analysis
- Minor merger-induced cold fronts in Abell 2142 and RXJ1720.1+2638
- Mass profiles and galaxy orbits in nearby galaxy clusters from the analysis of the projected phase-space
- Dynamical Study of A1689 from Wide-Field VLT/VIMOS Spectroscopy: Mass Profile, Concentration Parameter, and Velocity Anisotropy
- Identification of members in the central and outer regions of galaxy clusters
- A Robust and Efficient Deep Learning Method for Dynamical Mass Measurements of Galaxy Clusters
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Dynamical masses for 44 SZ-selected galaxy clusters over 755 square degrees
- Dynamical Mass Measurements of Contaminated Galaxy Clusters Using Machine Learning
- NoSOCS in SDSS. I. Sample Definition and Comparison of Mass Estimates
- The mass and anisotropy profiles of galaxy clusters from the projected phase space density: testing the method on simulated data
- Mass estimates from stellar proper motions: The mass of Centauri
- Virial scaling of galaxies in clusters: bright to faint is cool to hot
- The orbital velocity anisotropy of cluster galaxies: evolution
- NoSOCS in SDSS. II. Mass Calibration of Low Redshift Galaxy Clusters with Optical and X-ray Properties
- Dynamical mass inference of galaxy clusters with neural flows
- SPITZER observations of Abell 1763. III. The infrared luminosity function in different supercluster environments
- Brighter galaxy bias: underestimating the velocity dispersions of galaxy clusters
- Ram pressure and dusty red galaxies - key factors in the evolution of the multiple cluster system Abell 901/902
- Galaxy Cluster Mass Reconstruction Project - IV. Understanding the effects of imperfect membership on cluster mass estimation
- Constraining the Mass Profiles of Stellar Systems: Schwarzschild Modeling of Discrete Velocity Datasets
- The anatomy of Leo I: how tidal tails affect the kinematics
- Disentangling correlated scatter in cluster mass measurements
- Galaxy subgroups in galaxy clusters
- Dark Matter annihilation in Draco: new considerations of the expected gamma flux
- Comparing gravitational redshifts of SDSS galaxy clusters with the magnification redshift enhancement of background BOSS galaxies
- Biases in galaxy cluster velocity dispersion and mass estimates in the small number of galaxies regime
- Approximate Bayesian Uncertainties on Deep Learning Dynamical Mass Estimates of Galaxy Clusters
- A multi-wavelength strong lensing analysis of baryons and dark matter in the dynamically active cluster AC 114
- The GOGREEN survey: the internal dynamics of clusters of galaxies at redshift 0.9-1.4
- Cosmological Parameter Determination in Free-Form Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling
- From the core to the outskirts: structure analysis of three massive galaxy clusters
- Phase-space shapes of clusters and rich groups of galaxies
- The geometry of the filamentary environment of galaxy clusters
- GalWeight: A New and Effective Weighting Technique for Determining Galaxy Cluster and Group Membership
- Shape, shear & flexion: An analytic flexion formalism for realistic mass profiles
- Distribution and evolution of galaxy groups in the Ursa Major supercluster
- The mass profile and dynamical status of the z~0.8 galaxy cluster LCDCS 0504
- Revising the merger scenario of the galaxy cluster Abell 1644: a new gas poor structure discovered by weak gravitational lensing
- A new tool to determine masses and mass profiles using gravitational flexion
- Unveiling the internal structure of Hercules supercluster
- New Constraints on the Complex Mass Substructure in Abell 1689 from Gravitational Flexion
- Dynamical analysis of clusters of galaxies from cosmological simulations
- Probing Saraswati's heart: evaluating the dynamical state of the massive galaxy cluster A2631 through a comprehensive weak-lensing and dynamical analysis
- BASILISK: Bayesian Hierarchical Inference of the Galaxy-Halo Connection using Satellite Kinematics--I. Method and Validation
- Testing General Relativity: new measurements of gravitational redshift in galaxy clusters
- C2-GaMe: Classification of Cluster Galaxy Membership with Machine Learning