Redshift and Shear Calibration: Impact on Cosmic Shear Studies and Survey Design
arXiv:astro-ph/0603696 · doi:10.1016/j.astropartphys.2006.05.008
Abstract
The cosmological interpretation of weak lensing by large-scale structures requires knowledge of the redshift distribution of the source galaxies. Current lensing surveys are often calibrated using external redshift samples which span a significantly smaller sky area in comparison to the lensing survey, and are thus subject to sample variance. Some future lensing surveys are expected to be calibrated in the same way, in particular the fainter galaxy populations where the entire color coverage, and hence photometric redshift estimate, could be challenging to obtain. Using N-body simulations, we study the impact of this sample variance on cosmic shear analysis and show that, to first approximation, it behaves like a shear calibration error 1+/-epsilon. Using the Hubble Deep Field as a redshift calibration survey could therefore be a problem for current lensing surveys. We discuss the impact of the redshift distribution sampling error and a shear calibration error on the design of future lensing surveys, and find that a lensing survey of area Theta square degrees and limiting magnitude m_lim}, has a minimum shear and redshift calibration accuracy requirements given by epsilon = epsilon_0 10^{beta(m_lim-24.5)} / sqrt(Theta/ 200). Above that limit, lensing surveys would not reach their full potential. Using the galaxy number counts from the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field, we find (epsilon_0,beta)=(0.015,-0.18) and (epsilon_0,beta)=(0.011,-0.23) for ground and space based surveys respectively. Lensing surveys with no or limited redshift information and/or poor shear calibration accuracy will loose their potential to analyse the cosmic shear signal in the sub-degree angular scales, and therefore complete photometric redshift coverage should be a top priority for future lensing surveys.
Accepted version to Astroparticle Physics
References in corpus (1)
Cited by in corpus (20)
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
- The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses
- The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology
- CARS: the CFHTLS-Archive-Research Survey; I. Five-band multi-colour data from 37 sq. deg. CFHTLS-Wide observations
- Optimal Surveys for Weak Lensing Tomography
- KiDS+VIKING-450 and DES-Y1 combined: Mitigating baryon feedback uncertainty with COSEBIs
- Bayesian Galaxy Shape Measurement for Weak Lensing Surveys -II. Application to Simulations
- Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
- The Masses and Shapes of Dark Matter Halos from Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in the CFHTLS
- Cosmic shear analysis of archival HST/ACS data: I. Comparison of early ACS pure parallel data to the HST/GEMS Survey
- GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey: VI. Cosmic shear analysis
- Tracking quintessence by cosmic shear - Constraints from VIRMOS-Descart and CFHTLS and future prospects
- GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey: VII. Probing galaxy bias using weak gravitational lensing
- Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
- Propagating sample variance uncertainties in redshift calibration: simulations, theory and application to the COSMOS2015 data
- ShapePipe: a new shape measurement pipeline and weak-lensing application to UNIONS/CFIS data
- The effects of varying depth in cosmic shear surveys
- Pixelation Effects in Weak Lensing
- Scalar-field quintessence by cosmic shear: CFHT data analysis and forecasts for DUNE
- Dark energy constraints and correlations with systematics from CFHTLS weak lensing, SNLS supernovae Ia and WMAP5