The Anthropic Principle and the Duration of the Cosmological Past
arXiv:astro-ph/0505005 · doi:10.1080/10556790412331335327
Abstract
The place of an anthropic argument in the discrimination between various cosmological models is to be reconsidered following the classic criticisms of Paul C. W. Davies and Frank J. Tipler. Different versions of the anthropic argument against cosmologies involving an infinite series of past events are analyzed and applied to several instructive instances. This is not only of historical significance but presents an important topic for the future of cosmological research if some of the contemporary inflationary models, particularly Linde's chaotic inflation, turn out to be correct. Cognitive importance of the anthropic principle(s) to the issue of extraterrestrial intelligent observers is reconsidered in this light and several related problems facing cosmologies with past temporal infinities are also clearly defined. This issue is not only a clear example of the epistemological significance of the anthropic principle, but also has consequences for such diverse topics as SETI studies, epistemological status of cosmological concepts, theory of observation selection effects, and history of astronomy.
arXiv comment45 pages, 1 figure
References in corpus (8)
- From the Big Bang Theory to the Theory of a Stationary Universe
- Predictions from Quantum Cosmology
- Eternal inflation and the initial singularity
- The End of the Age Problem, And The Case For A Cosmological Constant Revisited
- Is Dark Matter in Spiral Galaxies Cold Gas? I. Observational Constraints and Dynamical Clues About Galaxy Evolution
- Eternal inflation, black holes, and the future of civilizations
- The Anthropic Argument against Infinite Past and the Eddington-Lemaitre Universe
- Ancient Origins of a Modern Anthropic Cosmological Argument