Comparison of two optical cluster finding algorithms for the new generation of deep galaxy surveys

Abstract

We present a comparison between two optical cluster finding methods: a matched filter algorithm using galaxy angular coordinates and magnitudes, and a percolation algorithm using also redshift information. We test the algorithms on two mock catalogues. The first mock catalogue is built by adding clusters to a Poissonian background, while the other is derived from N-body simulations. Choosing the physically most sensible parameters for each method, we carry out a detailed comparison and investigate advantages and limits of each algorithm, showing the possible biases on final results. We show that, combining the two methods, we are able to detect a large part of the structures, thus pointing out the need to search for clusters in different ways in order to build complete and unbiased samples of clusters, to be used for statistical and cosmological studies. In addition, our results show the importance of testing cluster finding algorithms on different kinds of mock catalogues to have a complete assessment of their behaviour.

11 pages, 10 figures, accepted by A&A

References in corpus (25)

• The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
• The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectra and redshifts
• Using the Evolution of Clusters to Constrain Omega
• A New Method For Galaxy Cluster Detection I: The Algorithm
• K and evolutionary corrections from UV to IR
• GALICS I: A hybrid N-body semi-analytic model of hierarchical galaxy formation
• The Palomar Distant Cluster Survey: I. The Cluster Catalog
• The Cut & Enhance method : selecting clusters of galaxies from the SDSS commissioning data
• Detecting Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey I : Monte Carlo Comparison of Cluster Detection Algorithms
• An Automated Cluster Finder: the Adaptive Matched Filter
• The Las Campanas Distant Cluster Survey - The Catalog
• Clusters of galaxies in the local universe
• The CNOC2 Field Galaxy Redshift Survey I: The Survey and the Catalog for the Patch CNOC 0223+00
• Projection effects in cluster catalogues
• Three-Dimensional Identification and Reconstruction of Galaxy Systems within Deep Redshift Surveys
• Distant Cluster Hunting II: A comparison of X-ray and optical cluster detection techniques and catalogs from the ROX Survey
• The Apm Galaxy Survey IV: Redshifts of Rich Clusters of Galaxies
• Distant Cluster Hunting I: A Comparison Between the Optical and X-ray Luminosity Functions from an Optical/X-ray Survey
• Distant Galaxy Clusters Identified From Optical Background Fluctuations
• Completeness in Photometric and Spectroscopic Searches for Clusters
• ESO Imaging Survey VII. Distant Cluster Candidates over 12 square degrees
• Spectroscopic Observations of Optically Selected Clusters of Galaxies from the Palomar Distant Cluster Survey
• Tests of the Las Campanas Distant Cluster Survey from Confirmation Observations for the ESO Distant Cluster Survey
• Group analysis in the SSRS2 catalog
• On the Nature of the EIS Candidate Clusters: Confirmation of z<0.6 candidates

Cited by in corpus (5)

• The XMM-LSS survey: optical assessment and properties of different X-ray selected cluster classes
• The Vimos VLT Deep Survey: Compact structures in the CDFS
• Clusters, Groups, and Filaments in the Chandra Deep Field-South up to Redshift 1
• Multi-object spectroscopy of low redshift EIS clusters. III. Properties of optically selected clusters
• Dynamics of Abell 3266 - I. An Optical View of a Complex Merging Cluster