A Richness Study of 14 Distant X-ray Clusters From the 160 Square Degree Survey

Abstract

We have measured the surface density of galaxies toward 14 X-ray-selected cluster candidates at redshifts greater than z=0.46, and we show that they are associated with rich galaxy concentrations. We find that the clusters range between Abell richness classes 0-2, and have a most probable richness class of one. We compare the richness distribution of our distant clusters to those for three samples of nearby clusters with similar X-ray luminosities. We find that the nearby and distant samples have similar richness distributions, which shows that clusters have apparently not evolved substantially in richness since redshift z =0.5. We compare the distribution of distant X-ray clusters in the L_x--richness plane to the distribution of optically-selected clusters from the Palomar Distant Cluster Survey. The optically-selected clusters appear overly rich for their X-ray luminosities when compared to X-ray-selected clusters. Apparently, X-ray and optical surveys do not necessarily sample identical mass concentrations at large redshifts. This may indicate the existence of a population of optically rich clusters with anomalously low X-ray emission. More likely, however, it reflects the tendency for optical surveys to select unvirialized mass concentrations, as might be expected when peering along large-scale filaments.

arXiv commentThe abstract has been abridged. Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal

References in corpus (23)

• The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
• Using the Evolution of Clusters to Constrain Omega
• The ROSAT Brightest Cluster Sample (BCS) - I. The compilation of the sample and the cluster log N-log S distribution
• Mass Estimates of X-Ray Clusters
• A Catalog of 200 Galaxy Clusters Serendipitously Detected in the ROSAT PSPC Pointed Observations
• The ROSAT Deep Cluster Survey: the X-ray Luminosity Function out to z=0.8
• The Palomar Distant Cluster Survey: I. The Cluster Catalog
• The Luminosity-Temperature Relation at z=0.4 for Clusters of galaxies
• The Average Mass Profile of Galaxy Clusters
• Constraining Omega with Cluster Evolution
• GALAXY DYNAMICS IN CLUSTERS
• The WARPS survey - II: The Log(N)-Log(S) relation and the X-ray evolution of low luminosity Clusters of Galaxies
• A Quantitative Measure of the Richness of Galaxy Clusters
• The Cluster of Galaxies Surrounding Cygnus A
• Evolution of Cluster X-Ray Luminosities and Radii: Results from the 160 Square Degree ROSAT Survey
• On The Evolution of X-ray Clusters at High Redshift
• A Study of Nine High-Redshift Clusters of Galaxies: I. The Survey
• Constraints on CDM theories from observations of massive, X-ray luminous clusters of galaxies at high redshift
• Cluster Evolution in the ROSAT North Ecliptic Pole Survey
• Constraints on Ω_0 and Cluster Evolution Using the ROSAT LogN-LogS
• A Dynamical Study of Optically Selected Distant Clusters
• X-ray Observations of Distant Optically Selected Cluster
• The Palomar Distant Cluster Survey : II. The Cluster Profiles

Cited by in corpus (8)

• The 160 Square Degree ROSAT Survey: the Revised Catalog of 201 Clusters with Spectroscopic Redshifts
• The X-ray Properties of Nearby Abell Clusters from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey: The Sample and Correlations with Optical Properties
• ChaMP Serendipitous Galaxy Cluster Survey
• Evidence for Rapid Redshift Evolution of Strong Cluster Cooling Flows
• The radio galaxy 3C 356 and clues to the trigger mechanisms for powerful radio sources
• Weak lensing observations of potentially X-ray underluminous galaxy clusters
• The XXL Survey XLV. Linking the ages of optically selected groups to their X-ray emission
• Clustering environment of BL Lac object RGB 1745+398