The Case Against Cosmology
arXiv:astro-ph/0009020 · doi:10.1023/A:1001981929727
Abstract
It is argued that some of the recent claims for cosmology are grossly overblown. Cosmology rests on a very small database: it suffers from many fundamental difficulties as a science (if it is a science at all) whilst observations of distant phenomena are difficult to make and harder to interpret. It is suggested that cosmological inferences should be tentatively made and sceptically received.
9 pages, no figures
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Galaxies as simple dynamical systems: observational data disfavor dark matter and stochastic star formation
- Measuring the metric: a parametrized post-Friedmanian approach to the cosmic dark energy problem
- Alternative Explanations of the Cosmic Microwave Background: A Historical and an Epistemological Perspective
- The Structure and Interpretation of Cosmology: Part I - General Relativistic Cosmology
- The Apparent Fractal Conjecture: Scaling Features in Standard Cosmologies
- Observational evidence favors a static universe
- High-resolution spectroscopy of the R Coronae Borealis and Other Hydrogen Deficient Stars
- Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology is Alive and Well - A Reply to Disney
- Mathematics and explanation in astronomy and astrophysics
- Non-standard Models and the Sociology of Cosmology