The Bright SHARC Survey: The Selection Function and its Impact on the Cluster X-ray Luminosity Function

Abstract

We present the results of a set of simulations designed to quantify the selection function of the Bright SHARC survey for distant clusters. The statistical significance of the simulations relied on the creation of thousands of artificial clusters with redshifts and luminosities in the range 0.25<z<0.95 and 0.5<L_X<10x10^44 erg/s (0.5-2.0 keV). We created 1 standard and 19 varied distribution functions, each of which assumed a different set of cluster, cosmological and operational parameters. The parameters we varied included the values of Omega_0, Omega_Lambda, Beta, core radius and ellipticity. We also investigated how non-standard surface brightness profiles; cooling flows; and the ROSAT pointing target, influence the selection function in the Bright SHARC survey. For our standard set we adopted the parameters used during the derivation of the Bright SHARC Cluster X-ray Luminosity Function (CXLF), i.e. Omega_0=1, Omega_Lambda=0 and an isothermal Beta model with beta=0.67, r_c=250 kpc and e=0.15. We found that certain parameters have a dramatic effect on our ability to detect clusters, e.g. the presence of a NFW profile or a strong cooling flow profile, or the value of r_c and beta. Other parameters had very little effect, e.g. the type of ROSAT target and the cluster ellipticity. We show also that all the tested parameters have only a small influence on the computed luminosity of the clusters except the presence of a strong cooling flow. We conclude that the CXLF presented in Nichol et al. (1999) is robust (under the assumption of standard parameters), but stress the importance of cluster follow-up in order to better constrain the morphology of the distant clusters found in the Bright SHARC and other surveys.

15 figures, tables included, accepted in ApJ, short abstract

References in corpus (4)

• The Bright SHARC Survey: The Cluster Catalog
• Brief Note: Analytical Fit to the Luminosity Distance for Flat Cosmologies with a Cosmological Constant
• The WARPS survey: III. The discovery of an X-ray luminous galaxy cluster at z=0.833 and the impact of X-ray substructure on cluster abundance measurements
• The Bright SHARC Survey: The X-ray Cluster Luminosity Function

Cited by in corpus (20)

• A MaxBCG Catalog of 13,823 Galaxy Clusters from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• The C4 Clustering Algorithm: Clusters of Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• A GMBCG Galaxy Cluster Catalog of 55,424 Rich Clusters from SDSS DR7
• XMM-Newton observation of the distant (z=0.6) galaxy cluster RX J1120.1+4318
• The WARPS Survey: VI. Galaxy Cluster and Source Identifications from Phase I
• The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology
• The cosmological analysis of X-ray cluster surveys: II- Application of the CR-HR method to the XMM archive
• The XMM--NEWTON Omega Project: I. The X-ray Luminosity - Temperature Relation at z>0.4
• X-ray Selected Intermediate-Redshift Groups of Galaxies
• Cl 1205+44, a fossil group at z = 0.59
• The Selection Function of SZ Cluster Surveys
• Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters in the XMM Large-Scale Structure Survey
• Euclid preparation III. Galaxy cluster detection in the wide photometric survey, performance and algorithm selection
• Optical and X-ray clusters as tracers of the supercluster-void network. II The spatial correlation function
• New X-ray Clusters in the EMSS I: Modifications to the XLF
• Eccentricity Evolution in Simulated Galaxy Clusters
• Cluster and cluster galaxy evolution history from IR to X-ray observations of the young cluster RX J1257.2+4738 at z=0.866
• New X-ray Clusters in the EMSS II: Optical Properties
• Discovery of a cluster of galaxies behind the Milky Way: X-ray and optical observations
• An extension of the SHARC survey