The Apparent and Intrinsic Shape of the APM Galaxy Clusters
arXiv:astro-ph/0002459 · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03590.x
Abstract
We estimate the distribution of intrinsic shapes of APM galaxy clusters from the distribution of their apparent shapes. We measure the projected cluster ellipticities using two alternative methods. The first method is based on moments of the discrete galaxy distribution while the second is based on moments of the smoothed galaxy distribution. We study the performance of both methods using Monte Carlo cluster simulations covering the range of APM cluster distances and including a random distribution of background galaxies. We find that the first method suffers from severe systematic biases, whereas the second is more reliable. After excluding clusters dominated by substructure and quantifying the systematic biases in our estimated shape parameters, we recover a corrected distribution of projected ellipticities. We use the non-parametric kernel method to estimate the smooth apparent ellipticity distribution, and numerically invert a set of integral equations to recover the corresponding distribution of intrinsic ellipticities under the assumption that the clusters are either oblate or prolate spheroids. The prolate spheroidal model fits the APM cluster data best.
8 pages, including 7 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (2)
Cited by in corpus (35)
- Intracluster Light in Nearby Galaxy Clusters: Relationship to the Halos of Brightest Cluster Galaxies
- Statistics of Physical Properties of Dark Matter Clusters
- Finding Galaxy Clusters using Voronoi Tessellations
- Cluster Alignments and Ellipticities in LCDM Cosmology
- The Three-Dimensional Shapes of Galaxy Clusters
- Correlations in the orientations of galaxy clusters
- Probing the Intrinsic Shape and Alignment of Dark Matter Haloes using SDSS Galaxy Groups
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: Evolution of the non-linear galaxy bias up to z=1.5
- Searching for cluster substructure using APM and ROSAT data
- The angular momentum of cold dark matter haloes with and without baryons
- The Cluster Substructure - Alignment Connection
- Measuring the Three-Dimensional Structure of Galaxy Clusters. II. Are clusters of galaxies oblate or prolate?
- Galaxy Alignments as a Probe of the Dynamical State of Clusters
- Mass, shape and thermal properties of A1689 by a multi-wavelength X-ray, lensing and Sunyaev-Zel'dovich analysis
- The Shape-Alignment relation in CDM Cosmic Structures
- The Shape of Poor Groups of Galaxies
- An imaging survey of a uniform sample of Brightest Cluster Galaxies and Intracluster Light
- On the deprojection of clusters of galaxies combining X-ray, Sunyaev-Zeldovich temperature decrement and gravitational lensing maps
- CLUMP-3D. Three dimensional lensing and multi-probe analysis of MACS J1206.2-0847, a remarkably regular cluster
- Distribution of satellite galaxies in high redshift groups
- On the over-concentration problem of strong lensing clusters
- Recent Dynamical Evolution of Galaxy Clusters
- Alignments of Group Galaxies with Neighboring Groups
- Shape and orientation of the gas distribution in A1689
- Morphological & Dynamical Properties of low redshift 2dFGRS Groups
- Galaxy cluster's rotation
- Constraints in Cosmological Parameter Space from the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect and Thermal Bremsstrahlung
- Fossil Group Origins VII. Galaxy substructures in fossil systems
- Phase-space shapes of clusters and rich groups of galaxies
- The Relation between Morphology and Dynamics of Poor Groups of Galaxies
- The XMM/2dF survey III: Comparison between optical and X-ray cluster detection methods
- The Impact of Cluster Structure and Dynamical State on Scatter in the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Flux-Mass Relation
- Eccentricity Evolution in Simulated Galaxy Clusters
- A Multiphase Model for the Intracluster Medium
- Large-Scale Environmental Effects of the Cluster Distribution