paper

Is the acceleration scale of the radial acceleration relation tracking the cosmic expansion rate?

arXiv:2609.38796 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stag1485

Abstract

The MUSE-DARK survey has reported a highly significant increase of the radial acceleration relation (RAR) scale with redshift over , parametrized linearly and described by its authors as phenomenological. We confront the same binned measurements with physically motivated scalings, using the continuous family as the primary statistic. We find (statistical, plotted uncertainties read as ): a redshift-independent scale () is excluded at by a nested test, and the matter-density scaling () at . Hubble tracking, , with effective exponent , is consistent with the measurement within and is the information-criterion-preferred one-parameter description; its amplitude, m s, lies 17 per cent above the canonical SPARC value, within the latter's systematic-dominated uncertainty. The survey's remark that the evolution is 'faster than ' is shown to be anchor-dependent: relative to a floating amplitude the binned growth is, if anything, mildly shallower than . All exponent-based conclusions are invariant under redshift-independent rescalings of , and hence robust to common-mode stellar-mass systematics. At current precision, the long-noted coincidence survives its first confrontation with direct kinematic measurements at intermediate redshift.

4 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables. Published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 551(4), 2026

References in corpus (13)