paper

Good Pretraining, Bad SFT: Checkpoint Quality Across the Training Stack

arXiv:2609.08966

Abstract

Language-model checkpoints are commonly selected by pretraining loss or benchmark scores, assuming that the highest-scoring checkpoint will remain the best starting point for subsequent training. We show that this assumption can fail in a full 30B mixture-of-experts training pipeline. The checkpoints that perform better after the full downstream training stack also have higher solution density, i.e., retain downstream performance under local weight perturbations.

Good Pretraining, Bad SFT: Checkpoint Quality Across the Training Stack · wovepaper