On Computational Hardness of Mistake-Bounded Language Generation: A Random-Oracle Query Separation

Abstract

Generation in the limit guarantees eventual generation for every countable collection of infinite languages in the model of Kleinberg and Mullainathan [KM24], while closure dimension characterizes stronger information-theoretic guarantees [RLT25]. Neither restricts per-output computation. The cumulative-mistake objective in mistake-bounded generation makes finite failure prefixes quantitative [KPR26], and a per-output query budget exposes their computational source. Polynomial-time algorithms are known for parities, conjunctions, and monotone functions with polynomially many maxterms [JKO26]. We ask whether information-theoretic ease can coexist with bounded-access computational hardness. Relative to a random oracle $H$, we answer yes by constructing a countable collection $C^{\star }$ of infinite languages with closure dimension zero. Almost surely on the same $H$, an unbounded generator makes zero mistakes on every target and every complete distinct enumeration. Yet, writing $\lambda$ for the target-seed length, every fixed uniform generator $G$ with polynomially many oracle queries in $\lambda$ and the output index $i$ has a constant $c_G>0$ such that, for every sufficiently large $\lambda$, some target incurs more than $2^{c_G\lambda }$ expected mistakes within its first $2(\lceil 2^{c_G\lambda }\rceil +1)$ canonical outputs. Infinite accidental agreement enables exhaustive search; sparse queries hide fresh target values. Thus, in the random-oracle model, zero-mistake information-theoretic generation coexists with a generator-dependent exponential lower bound on worst-case expected mistakes under polynomial-query access.