NewEvery arXiv paper, its researchers & institutions — mapped.
cosmology

Growth, geometry, and early-universe split of the matter density parameter $Ω_{\rm m}$

arXiv:2607.28326

summary

The paper separates the present‑day matter density parameter Ωₘ into geometric, growth, and early‑universe contributions using DES, Planck, DESI BAO, Pantheon+ supernovae, and RSD data, finding a strong correlation between geometry and early‑universe regimes and a ~2σ difference between them.

Abstract

While the $Λ$ cold dark matter ($Λ$CDM) model can successfully reproduce the measurements of many cosmological probes, some discrepancies have recently emerged. Therefore, it is necessary to test the standard cosmological model for consistency. An important stress test is to separate the influence of different cosmological regimes on the parameter inference. We treat three regimes separately here: geometry, growth, and the early universe. The geometrical regime concerns the expansion and curvature history, while the growth regime governs structure formation and the early-universe regime affects physics prior to recombination. Previous analyses have performed the split between geometry and growth, whereas we also consider the early universe influence separately. We perform this split for the present day matter density parameter $Ω_{\rm m}$ using multiple cosmological observables. The used data are galaxy clustering and weak lensing statistics (3x2pt) from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), cosmic microwave background (CMB) data from Planck, spectroscopic baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), type-Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) samples from Pantheon+, and redshift-space distortions (RSD) from a collection of galaxy surveys. For each of these probes, we introduce a phenomenological split into these three regimes. This work shows a strong correlation between the geometric and the early regime for the matter density, but no strong correlation between the growth regime and the others. All regimes are compatible in the posterior distribution, however the difference between the geometry and the early regimes, $ΔΩ_{\rm m}^{\rm geo,early}$, is 2$σ$ apart from 0.

15 pages including references, 15 figures

Topics & keywords