medical imaging

Beyond Classification: Pathology Foundation Models as Detection Encoders for Mitotic Figures

arXiv:2607.28007

summary

The paper evaluates whether pathology foundation models can serve as effective backbones for dense detection of mitotic figures, comparing several self‑supervised models to a ResNet50 baseline using RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN, and Deformable DETR on the MIDOG++ and TUPAC16 datasets.

Abstract

Pathology foundation models (FMs) are models trained on vast amounts of typically unlabeled data and have been shown to yield regularized latent spaces that can be used effectively in downstream classification tasks. This is also true for the classification of mitotic figures vs. other cells. However, it is so far unclear if the latent space of current FMs provides features that are discriminant and spatially suitably resolved to also serve as a backbone for dense object detection paradigms. In this work, we investigate this question for common current pathology FMs (UNI, UNI2-h, Virchow, Virchow2, H-optimus-0, H-optimus-1) and compare their performance against a fully end-to-end trained baseline based on a ResNet50 architecture. We combine FM backbones with representatives of single stage, dual stage and self-attention-based detectors (RetinaNet, Faster R-CNN, Deformable DETR respectively) on the multi-domain MIDOG++ dataset, and on the TUPAC16 dataset as an out-of-domain case. We show that the H-optimus-0 and Virchow models yielded competitive performance, indicating that the latent spaces of current FMs, all trained on image-level self-supervision, are suitable for direct mitotic figure detection and may be slightly more robust on our out-of-domain test case. All code is made available publicly at https://github.com/DeepMicroscopy/FM4MFdet.

Topics & keywords

#pathology foundation models#mitotic figure detection#dense object detection#self-supervised learning#transfer learningfoundation modelsRetinaNetFaster R-CNNDeformable DETRMIDOG++TUPAC16self‑supervision