optimal transport

Sample Complexity for the 2-Gromov-Wasserstein Distance

arXiv:2607.27514

summary

The paper studies how many samples are needed for the empirical plug‑in estimator of the 2‑Gromov‑Wasserstein distance between compactly supported probability measures in Euclidean spaces, establishing a sharp convergence rate that depends on the smaller ambient dimension.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the sample complexity of the empirical plug-in estimator for the -Gromov-Wasserstein distance between compactly supported probability measures on Euclidean spaces. Let and be supported on compact subsets of and , respectively, and let and be their empirical measures based on independent samples of size . We prove that \[ \mathbb{E}\left|D_2^2(\widehatμ_n,\widehatν_n)-D_2^2(μ,ν)\right| \lesssim n^{-2/((d_x\wedge d_y)\vee 4)} (\log n)^{\mathbf 1_{\{d_x\wedge d_y=4\}}}. \] This rate is sharp up to the logarithmic factor in the critical dimension. The proof is based on a geometric representation of the Euclidean distance as a squared -distance between half-space feature maps. This yields a variational dual formulation of the Gromov-Wasserstein functional in terms of a family of classical optimal transport problems indexed by an infinite-dimensional auxiliary parameter. Although the resulting cost functions need not be semiconcave in either argument, we introduce a marginal recentering of the costs that restores the concavity structure needed for sharp metric-entropy bounds. Combining this representation with empirical-process estimates gives a rate governed by the smaller of the two ambient dimensions.

29 pages, 2 figures

Topics & keywords

#gromov-wasserstein distance#sample complexity#optimal transport#empirical processes#metric entropy2-Gromov-Wassersteinplug-in estimatorconvergence ratehalf-space feature mapsvariational dual formulationmetric-entropy bounds
Sample Complexity for the 2-Gromov-Wasserstein Distance · wovepaper