Mean-Tilted Intervals: A Generalized-Bayes Approach to Fixed-Content and Tolerance Intervals
arXiv:2607.26098
The paper develops a framework for relaxed quantile regression that defines interval functionals based on content and mean‑tilting, and introduces loss‑based generalized Bayesian posterior computation using pseudo‑asymmetric Laplace augmentations and various sampling schemes.
Abstract
Intervals with the same probability content can have different endpoint placements and widths. This ambiguity matters for regression and tolerance inference because equal-tailed, mean-preserving, and shortest-contiguous intervals answer different questions. We study the residual-product criterion introduced as Relaxed Quantile Regression and show that, under regularity conditions, its unrestricted regular minimizer is the unique fixed-content interval whose retained mean equals the population mean. We call this target the mean-preserving interval (MPI). Mean-tilted intervals (MTIs) generalize MPI by replacing zero retained-mean balance with a fixed retained-mean offset: \(δ=0\) recovers MPI, and nonzero tilts index other contiguous fixed-content windows, including equal-tailed and shortest-contiguous intervals through distribution-specific tilts. For estimation, we develop a loss-based generalized-Bayes update for the two interval endpoints. A pseudo-asymmetric-Laplace normal-exponential augmentation gives Gibbs computation with generalized-inverse-Gaussian latent-scale updates and conditionally Gaussian endpoint updates. Exact inverse-scale moments also give a deterministic expectation/conditional-maximization mode algorithm. The framework covers ridge-regularized static regression, frozen-feature deep echo state network readouts, and dynamic linear root states. The same geometry motivates calibrated minimum-width tolerance actions. The empirical action selects the shortest closed order-statistic interval at a calibrated retained count, while a Dirichlet-process response-distribution layer gives fixed-interval Beta content probabilities for Bayesian-constrained scans. Tolerance confidence comes from scan calibration; posterior credibility summarizes the fitted generalized posterior.
29 pages, 3 figures, 1 table