EviPathBench: Benchmarking Evidence Acquisition and Reasoning in Vision-Language Models for Whole-Slide Pathology

Abstract

Whole-slide image (WSI) diagnosis requires identifying diagnostically relevant regions, examining them across magnifications, and integrating multi-scale evidence. However, most pathology benchmarks evaluate models on pre-cropped patches or pre-extracted slide features, leaving their ability to acquire evidence from gigapixel WSIs largely untested. We introduce EviPathBench, a benchmark for evaluating evidence acquisition and reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs) for whole-slide pathology. It evaluates four capabilities: image-to-text matching for evidence interpretation, text-to-image retrieval for evidence verification, diagnostic-region localization for evidence acquisition, and multi-scale reasoning for evidence integration. The benchmark is organized as a diagnostic tree linking nested regions across magnifications with scale-specific findings and path-level diagnoses. It contains 1,822 TCGA WSIs and 17,135 diagnostic paths annotated by ten board-certified pathologists. A private cohort of 190 breast cancer WSIs with detailed annotations further evaluates autonomous whole-slide exploration. We evaluate 19 VLMs spanning general-purpose, medical, and pathology-specialized families, plus one text-only reference model. Leading open-weight models achieve over 93% accuracy in multi-scale reasoning and over 50% in both cross-modal matching tasks. In contrast, diagnostic-region localization remains challenging: the best text-guided mean intersection-over-union is below 0.09, underperforming a center-based heuristic. During autonomous exploration, the unconditional hit rate drops from 0.522 at low magnification to 0.185 at intermediate magnification and 0.020 at high magnification. These results reveal a pronounced gap between reasoning over curated evidence and acquiring it from WSIs. EviPathBench provides a unified framework for measuring and improving both capabilities.