Beyond Object Validation: Relational Conformance in Multi-Artifact Agent Releases
arXiv:2607.14155
The paper examines how software releases can contain inconsistencies that evade validation, proposes a relational conformance profile that models releases as graphs linking claims, evidence, and decisions, and demonstrates practical mechanisms for detecting such failures.
Abstract
Agent systems validate inputs, tool calls, and generated objects. The final package often escapes the same scrutiny. In one DRSS release, the ledger supported 60 points and a failed certificate; the report announced a 100-point Gold Path. Every local gate was green. The package contradicted itself. We study that failure alongside Schema Docs, where similar faults became product contracts, and Brand Shuttle GEO, where evidence is turned into repair work. The result is a candidate Schema-SIP Relational Conformance profile (SIP-RC). It models a release as a graph: claims point to evidence, decisions carry bounded authority, derived artifacts retain their execution conditions and lineage, and published bytes must match the package that was checked. Hard failures cannot be averaged away, and a validator recomputes critical decisions on a separate path. The paper establishes the failure class and shows that several mechanisms are practical. Whether the full profile performs better than existing checks remains an open experiment.
10 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables. Schema Sandbox Research Preprint