Profile-Likelihood and Baseline-Sensitivity Diagnostics for Digitized Radiation-Sensor Decay Datasets
arXiv:2607.13118 · doi:10.3390/s26165056
The paper presents a reproducible workflow for analyzing digitized radiation‑sensor decay data, using weighted exponential fits, profile‑likelihood methods, and baseline‑sensitivity diagnostics to assess half‑life estimates when only figure‑level information is available.
Abstract
Accurate interpretation of radiation-sensor decay data is important for environmental monitoring, site remediation, radiation metrology, detector quality assurance, and nuclear data evaluation. When the original gamma-spectrometry records are unavailable, a published decay plot may be the only source that can be reanalyzed independently. This study presents a reproducible reduced-data workflow for testing half-life estimates from a digitized 198-Au decay dataset. A weighted exponential fit to the digitized data points reproduces the published room-temperature half-life, indicating that the main decay scale is retained in the figure-level dataset. The analysis then tests how the fitted result changes under plausible figure-level effects, including baseline-like offsets, time-axis reconstruction, finite-window leverage, and ratio-based robustness checks using pairwise summaries and Steiner's most frequent value statistics. The no-offset fit is locally well constrained, but small constant offsets can shift the fitted half-life because the normalization, decay constant, and residual baseline are partly degenerate over the limited time window. Toy Monte Carlo diagnostics show that some estimator shifts are expected for finite-window exponential data. This study does not revise recommended nuclear data or replace the original experiment. Instead, it shows how published radiation-sensor decay data can be tested for reproducibility, identifiability, and sensitivity to analysis choices when only reduced or figure-level information is available.
39 pages, 7 figures. Published in Sensors, 2026, Volume 26, Article 5056. The journal article is the version of record