theoretical computer science

ETH-Hardness of Learning Monotone Circuits and Approximating Their Size

arXiv:2607.12331

summary

The paper proves that, assuming the Randomised Exponential-Time Hypothesis, both PAC-learning monotone formulas and multiplicatively approximating the minimum monotone circuit size require super‑polynomial time, using lifting techniques from proof and communication complexity.

Abstract

We show the following hardness results for monotone learning and approximation of monotone circuit size: 1. Under the Randomised Exponential-Time Hypothesis (rETH), it requires time to PAC-learn monotone formulas with input bits and size by monotone circuits of size , for every . 2. Under the Randomised Exponential-Time Hypothesis (rETH), for any , there is a polynomially bounded function such that -multiplicatively approximating the minimum monotone circuit size of a monotone function consistent with a sequence of labelled examples over -bit inputs requires time . Our results are shown by a novel application of lifting arguments in proof and communication complexity to hardness of monotone learning, by building on the seminal result of Atserias and Müller (J. ACM, 2020) on hardness of automating Resolution proofs.

Topics & keywords

#monotone circuits#learning theory#complexity theory#hardness of approximation#proof complexityPAC learningrandomized exponential-time hypothesismonotone formulacircuit size approximationlifting argumentscommunication complexity
ETH-Hardness of Learning Monotone Circuits and Approximating Their Size · wovepaper