Topological Signatures of Imperial Collapse and Fragmentation: Administrative Dissolution, Territorial Reorganization and Early-Warning Observables in the Han Dynasty Network (206~BCE\,--\,220~CE)
arXiv:2607.09010
Abstract
We extend the persistent homology formalism done in references~\cite{paper1,paper2} to the Han Dynasty (--), testing whether the collapse threshold $\Hstar = 0.5241$ and the three-network decomposition methodology established for the Roman--Byzantine case generalize to a mechanistically distinct imperial system. Three complementary networks are constructed from geospatial and historical data: an administrative network ($\Hadm$, 392~prefectures from CHGIS~v6), a geographic network ($\Hgeo$, with node end-dates extended beyond administrative dissolution), and an 81-node Silk Road trade network ($\Htrd$) as a structural control. Edge costs are derived via least-cost path analysis on a digital elevation model, modulated by five historical friction channels. $\Hadm$ collapses to zero at 220~CE (phase~G slope , ) while $\Hgeo$ simultaneously \emph{increases} to , producing a divergence -- the topological signature of \emph{internal fragmentation}. The cross-network Wasserstein distance jumps from exactly zero to at ~CE, one decade after the Yellow Turban Rebellion, and three long-lived cycles matching the Wei, Shu, and Wu domains emerge under the post-184~CE fragmentation model -- thirty years before formal partition. Three independent early-warning indicators (Wasserstein velocity , correlation length , and the Integrated Change Tracker) signal collapse onset 45--50~years before formal dissolution.
24 pages, 7 figures