Disentangling modified gravity and galaxy bias with field-level inference

Abstract

We present a field-level inference framework for testing gravity with large-scale structure, exploiting the full information of the galaxy distribution. Traditional analyses based on the power spectrum discard non-Gaussian and Fourier phase information, resulting in strong degeneracies between modified gravity (MG) and galaxy bias. Our approach overcomes this limitation by performing a Bayesian analysis directly on the three-dimensional galaxy number counts, jointly constraining MG and bias parameters using both amplitudes and phases. As an illustrative application, we analyse mock data in real space in the context of $f(R)$ gravity and a non-linear galaxy bias model designed to mimic the real-data 2M++ BORG analysis of Jasche&Lavaux (2019). Non-linear structure formation is modelled using COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (COLA) under different gravity strengths, parameterised by $f_{R0}$. The resulting dark-matter fields are then mapped to mock galaxy catalogues via a non-linear bias prescription. We demonstrate that, with the initial phases assumed known, including non-Gaussian and phase information yields tighter constraints on both $f_{R0}$ and the primary bias parameter $\beta$ (corresponding to the linear galaxy bias on large scales), relative to power-spectrum-only analyses. Notably, the field-level approach breaks the degeneracies between MG and galaxy bias inherent to two-point statistics. Through a cosmic-web classification into voids, walls, filaments and clusters, we find that under-dense regions are the primary drivers in distinguishing gravity at the field level. Finally, we establish the robustness of our pipeline against variations in initial conditions, Poisson noise, and galaxy-field thresholding, providing a powerful path forward for field-level tests of gravity.

19 pages, 9 figures, accepted in MNRAS