ErdÅs Problem 684 at Density One: Small-prime Parts of Binomial Coefficients and Gaussian Fluctuations
arXiv:2606.08216
Abstract
For , let be the largest divisor of whose prime factors are at most . ErdÅs Problem #684 concerns the special threshold and asks how early this small-prime part can be forced to become large. We prove the density-one analogue for every fixed power threshold. If is the least for which , then, for each fixed , \[ f_c(n)=\left(\frac{c}{1-γ}+o(1)\right)\log n \] for almost all positive integers . In particular, \[ f_2(n)=\left(\frac{2}{1-γ}+o(1)\right)\log n =(4.730544237\ldots+o(1))\log n \] for the ErdÅs #684 threshold. This is a normal-order theorem, not a pointwise resolution of the corresponding worst-case problem. The constant is arithmetic. Kummer's theorem rewrites as a sum of carry indicators, and complete-residue averaging gives \[ m(k)=k\sum_{p\leq k}\frac{\log p}{p-1}-\log k!=(1-γ)k+o(k). \] The cancellation in this formula moves the typical crossing from the naive scale to . We prove the required concentration uniformly for every on one dyadic interval, after discarding a zero-density exceptional set caused by large powers of small primes dividing one of the nearby integers . We also prove Gaussian fluctuations in the logarithmic range. If , , and is uniform in , then \[ \frac{\log u(n,k)-m(k)}{\sqrt{V(k)}}\Rightarrow \mathcal N(0,1), \qquad V(k)\sim (2-\log(2Ï))k\log k. \] Higher prime powers are needed for the mean, but after centering their aggregate is -negligible on the Gaussian scale; the variance comes only from the prime levels.
19 pages, no figures