paper

Challenges in Explaining Pretrained Clinical Text Classifiers

arXiv:2605.28060 · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19105-2_22

Abstract

Explaining the predictions of neural models in clinical NLP remains a significant challenge, especially for complex tasks involving long, unstructured medical texts. While post-hoc methods like LIME and SHAP are widely used, they often fall short when applied to clinical narratives. In this paper, we identify core limitations of token-level and perturbation-based explanation techniques through targeted demonstra- tions on a hospital length-of-stay prediction task. Our findings reveal issues such as overemphasis on non-informative tokens, instability in at- tributions, and high-confidence predictions for incoherent input variants. These results underscore the need for explanation strategies that are clin- ically meaningful, semantically grounded, and robust to linguistic noise.

9 pages, 7 figures. Accepted at the First Workshop on Responsible Healthcare using Machine Learning (RHCML 2025), co-located with ECML PKDD 2025

Challenges in Explaining Pretrained Clinical Text Classifiers · wovepaper