paper

The power of unentanglement without destructive interference

arXiv:2604.27886

Abstract

Stoquasticity, originating in sign-problem-free physical systems, gives rise to , introduced by Bravyi, Bessen, and Terhal (2006), a quantum-inspired intermediate class between and . Unentanglement similarly gives rise to , introduced by Kobayashi, Matsumoto, and Yamakami (CJTCS 2009), which generalizes to two unentangled proofs and still has only the trivial upper bound. In this work, we initiate a systematic study of the power of unentanglement without destructive interference via , the class of unentangled stoquastic Merlin--Arthur proof systems. Beyond its complexity-theoretic interest, is connected to the optimality of non-negative tensor optimization algorithms. We highlight: 1. with -qubit proofs and completenes . Conversely, the Sum-of-Squares algorithm of Barak, Kelner, and Steurer (STOC 2014) gives an exponential-time upper bound for . Our tightened analysis shows the optimality of our protocol and the BKS algorithm under ETH. 2. For logarithmic-size proofs, with completeness and vanishing gap, while . Consequently, quantum-inspired randomness enables exponentially shorter unentangled proofs even under the assumption . 3. For , the parameter dependence in the general ETH-optimal time bound can be exponentially improved, or the bound achieved simultaneously with polynomial space. Our lower bounds are obtained by stoquastizing the short-proof protocols using distribution testing techniques. Our upper bounds for the nearly perfect completeness case are proved via our rectangular closure testing framework.

arXiv comment85 pages, 2 figures, 7 protocols, and 2 algorithms. Abstract shortened due to the arXiv length restriction. v3: Minor changes, to appear in SODA 2027. v2: Added the results that StoqMA(k)_log is in MA and StoqMA_log = BPP, and made minor changes