Restoration, Exploration and Transformation: How Youth Engage Character.AI Chatbots for Feels, Fun and Finding themselves
arXiv:2604.15340 · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790508 10.1145/3772318.3790508 10.1145/3772318.3790508 10.1145/3772318.3790508
Abstract
Young people are among the fastest adopters of generative AI, yet research emphasises adult-designed tools and experiments rather than playful, self-directed youth use. We analysed discourse from 4,172 users in Character.AI's official Discord, finding that the most engaged users were predominantly adolescents (50% aged 13-17), female or non-binary (61.9%), with most (59%) creating their own characters. We contribute (1) a descriptive account of how highly-engaged youth on Character.AI's Discord use AI for playful, emotional, and creative practices that push the platform limits; (2) a framework of three engagement intents -- Restoration (emotional regulation), Exploration (creative experimentation), and Transformation (identity development); and (3) a taxonomy of seven youth-created character archetypes. Together, these findings reveal how youth invent novel roles for AI, expose critical misalignments between youth use and current AI experiences, and provide frameworks for researchers and practitioners to design youth-centred AI futures.
19 pages, 3 figures. To appear in CHI '26 (ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems), April 2026, Barcelona, Spain
References in corpus (8)
- The Dark Side of AI Companionship: A Taxonomy of Harmful Algorithmic Behaviors in Human-AI Relationships
- AI Alignment: A Comprehensive Survey
- (Un)making AI Magic: a Design Taxonomy
- Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmark
- Leveraging AI-Generated Emotional Self-Voice to Nudge People towards their Ideal Selves
- Un-Straightening Generative AI: How Queer Artists Surface and Challenge the Normativity of Generative AI Models
- Clio: Privacy-Preserving Insights into Real-World AI Use
- LLMs are Biased Teachers: Evaluating LLM Bias in Personalized Education