Do equation of state parametrizations of dark energy faithfully capture the dynamics of the late universe?
arXiv:2604.12987
Abstract
We investigate how strongly late-time inferences about DE dynamics depend on the functional prior used to represent the expansion history. Using identical late-time combinations of CC, DESI BAO measurements, the Pantheon+ SN1a sample, and the H0DN prior, we compare a node-based reconstruction of the reduced Hubble function with a representative family of smooth low-dimensional DE EoS parametrizations, including CPL. Over the redshift range constrained by the data, both approaches yield consistent , and, in the absence of H0DN, compatible values of . However, a clear method dependence emerges at intermediate redshift (): the reconstruction favors stronger deceleration, , whereas the smooth parametrizations cluster at , implying a persistent discrepancy across dataset combinations and parametrizations. For the EoS-based parametrizations, whose effective DE densities remain positive by construction, the preferred values correspond to NECB-violating (phantom-like) behaviour, but this is a less robust discriminator as becomes ill-conditioned as . In the effective-fluid mapping, the reconstruction accommodates the same late-time kinematical preference through a rapid descent of toward very small values and a sign change, whereas the EoS-based parametrizations absorb it through smoother, and in several cases NECB-violating, evolution over . Although the reconstruction improves the best-fit likelihood, especially with H0DN, Bayesian evidence continues to favor the simpler parametric descriptions. Our results isolate as the key window in which EoS-based DE parametrizations can compress localized kinematic structure and associated features of DE that are still permitted by current late-time data.
20 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables