paper

Orbital Period Changes of Recurrent Nova T Pyxidis Demonstrate that M_ejecta >> 11.3xM_accreted and Is Not a Type Ia Supernova Progenitor

arXiv:2602.09377

Abstract

Recurrent nova (RN) T Pyxidis (T Pyx) has a complex history of mass accreting-onto and ejection-from the white dwarf, with a classical nova eruption around 1866 kick-starting a RN-phase with six RN eruptions from 1890--2011. T Pyx is a primary progenitor candidate for Type Ia supernovae (SNIa). This is chiefly a question of whether the mass accreted by the white dwarf () is more-or-less than the mass ejected by the nova eruptions () over the entire eruption cycle. Prior attempts to measure from the traditional methods have a scatter of 130, so only a new technique can provide a measure of adequate accuracy and reliability. This new technique is the timing experiment of measuring the orbital period from 1986 to 2025, where the period increased by 50.37.9 parts-per-million across the 2011 eruption. With simple and sure physics, the best estimate for the mass ejected by one RN event is 240010 M, with an extreme inviolate limit of 35410 M. Over all eruptions in a cycle, 1712010 M, with an inviolate limit of 214410 M. Over the full eruption cycle, the white dwarf accreted 22010 M. So M11.3M, and T Pyx can never become a SNIa. This paper is the seventh in a series proving that each of various popular candidate SNIa progenitors cannot possibly evolve to a supernova; including V445 Pup, U Sco, T CrB, all symbiotic stars, FQ Cir, V1405 Cas, and now T Pyx.

7th in a series of ApJ papers, each proving that popular progenitor candidates cannot become Type Ia supernovae: 1. V445 Pup (arXiv:2412.17286), 2. T CrB (arXiv:2510.01587), 3. U Sco (arXiv:2510.01589), 4. FQ Cir (arXiv:2511.16594), 5. all symbiotic stars (arXiv:2511.19948), 6. V1405 Cas (ApJ submitted), 7. T Pyx (ApJ in press)