Taking model-complete cores

Abstract

A first-order theory $T$ is a model-complete core theory if every first-order formula is equivalent modulo $T$ to an existential positive formula; a core companion of a theory $T$ is a model-complete core theory $S$ such that every model of $T$ maps homomorphically to a model of $S$ and vice-versa. Whilst core companions may not exist in general, if they exist, they are unique. Moreover, $\ddot{I}‰$-categorical theories always have a core companion, which is also $\ddot{I}‰$-categorical. We show that many model-theoretic properties, such as stability, $\mathrm{NIP}$, simplicity, and ${\mathrm{NSOP}}_k$ for $k\in {\mathbb{N}}_{>0}$, are preserved by moving to the core companion of a complete theory. On the other hand, we show that the classes of theories of structures interpretable over $(\mathbb{N};=)$ and over $(\mathbb{Q};<)$ are both not closed under taking core companions. The first class is contained in the class of theories of $\ddot{I}‰$-stable first-order reducts of finitely homogeneous relational structures, which was studied by Lachlan in the 80's. We conjecture the two classes to be equal. To support our conjecture we prove that all structures in Lachlan's class are trace definable in $(\mathbb{N};=)$, confirming a conjecture of Walsberg.

49 pages, 2 figures, 1 table